Monday, August 23, 2010

Is it true? We would have to pay Big Oil to drill AND for any oil found in Alaska?

you betcha ! It's called free enterprise; supply and demand.





That's all the oil companies have to do, is CUT BACK when the demand gets high, and presto, they can justify socking it ti to consumer, and charge what ever they want to increase the dividends to their stock holders.





It's called ReaGUNomics.Is it true? We would have to pay Big Oil to drill AND for any oil found in Alaska?
No. If we drill within the United States it is our oil, we own it, so the only people we would pay would be the company that we hire to drill and refine it for us. To avoid that the government could send in their own crews to do the work and then it would be a government controlled operation vs a civilian one. If we hired BIg Oil to do it then yes we would pay them.Is it true? We would have to pay Big Oil to drill AND for any oil found in Alaska?
Yes, it is true we pay corporations for goods and services.
It's true that where Big Oil is concerned, we have to bend over and take what they give us.. We have to smile too, otherwise they'll just screw us more.
No. Those are Democrat Lies.


They will not Allow us to drill in Anwr. Because it would bring the price of oil %26amp; gas down too much.


The Environmentalists give the Democrat Party millions of dollars every election, for keeping the price of oil %26amp; gas high.
  • makeup help
  • Where in australia do we drill for oil!!?

    I have a science assignment due on tuesday and i need to know where in australia we drill for oil, there are NO good sites that tell me, please someone helpWhere in australia do we drill for oil!!?
    Where in Australia does drilling for oil and gas take place? offshore or onshore? in what provinces?


    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?鈥?/a>Where in australia do we drill for oil!!?
    In wikipedia type ';oilfields of australia';. Its all there.
    outbacks

    Why isn't it profitable to drill for oil in Texas? Seems like with oil around $60 a barrel and dependence on .

    the mid-east opec that they'd be sinking bits all over the USA. And why don't we just be more friendly to Mexico in exchange for cheap oil?Why isn't it profitable to drill for oil in Texas? Seems like with oil around $60 a barrel and dependence on .
    First, Mexican government owns the oil company Pemex, and the Mexican Constitution prohibits foreign investment in oil. Second, with Texas need to get a permit first off to explore offshore for oil. Find oil then you gotta resubmit a permit and documentation that there is oil, and gotta go thru environmental assessment at the local, state, federal level to be able to drill for oil. Finally, it costs lots of money to build the Equipment to extract the oil, and the oil company found a oil reserve would have to spend a while to make sure its worth the investment for offshore oil drilling before they put the equipment to extract it out there. Finally. drilling for oil in Texas would be profitable if there wasn't environmental, and local red-tape. Dint worry Shell is learning the fine art of making oil out of tar sands in Montana to Alberta those deposits if extracted efficiently will provide oil for a long time. The other sources to make fuel like Straw grass would be a good idea because straw grass is the only source of ethanol that is actually a energy gainer. Corn based ethanol is a energy drainer because the time it tales to grow the crops., the fertilizers to protect and grow the corn, and the having to use heavy machinery to grab and extract the ethanol cello use from the corn. Personally not worried about oil much because other sources of extraction of oil will replace overtime oil from unfriendly suppliers.

    Will oklahoma cave in since they drilled so much oil?

    In some areas of the US, there has been subsidence due to extraction of oil - Long Beach, CA is one of these areas. However, I could find no report that any area in Oklahoma has had this probem due to oil extraction.

    Why don't more Republicans, drill for oil in their own yard, or just stick a straw in the ground and Suck ???

    Here on the liberal Left Coast we havw oil seeping out of the ground. What's you guys problem. Drill your onw oil.Why don't more Republicans, drill for oil in their own yard, or just stick a straw in the ground and Suck ???
    We will drill in our own yards when you stop supporting illegal immigration. You want me to pay 4-5 dollars a gallon next summer, then help us save money elsewhere.


    If not, you can look forward to seeing refineries in your back yard.Why don't more Republicans, drill for oil in their own yard, or just stick a straw in the ground and Suck ???
    It's the Liberals fault that we don't drill (despite the ban on offshore drilling signed by George H W Bush, backed by Jeb Bush)





    It's the Conservatives fault that oil companies don't want to drill on the land that they already have.





    How about we all take responsibility for the SUV's, NASCAR, and whatever that uses up so much energy and we power that energy with a finite source.
    If I had oil in the ground and had the means to get it out I would. However, I don't. So I'm doing the smart thing and driving a small car that's good on gas. In the meantime we should be drilling off shore and anywhere else we can until we can find another source of energy. A source that is renewable and practical. Of course the democraps would have us continue to drive big vehicles that drain oil out of our planet at an alarming rate.
    the sucking part is the issue. from what your telling us, liberals apparently have been doing that for years and conservatives never have been associated with it. again the answer to your question to avoid the liberal trolls is we dont because we need the liberals to set the example(sic) for the latter part of your question.
    Exactly!!!! I do the same thing in the Persian Gulf (since I live on a small island near Dubai). Every morning I just drill in my own backyard and give some to OPEC in exchange for some extra cash.;-p But they pay me in Euros!lol
    You nimrod, it's the dems that is fighting the drilling in our own country. Evidently you do not read enough. Even Obama is against doing it which other nimrods like you are supporting.
    The republicans already suck, it hasn't done any good.
    why do you refuse to tell the truth??? you must be a dem....


    If you had oil seeping out of the ground you would be rich! mmmm you are still here......



    We will drill in our backyards when Ted Kennedy allows a wind farm in Nantucket Sound.
    Give me like 200,000 dollars to put up a derrick and I will drill
    Well I dunno about most Americans, but this question sure sucks. Dumb...

    Why hasn't Bush drilled in Alaska for oil?

    He had a republican congress and senate for many years of his presidency and with high gas prices nobody in the US would have really cared about the environmental consequences. Well nobody that doesn't wear burkenstocks.Why hasn't Bush drilled in Alaska for oil?
    Liberals environmentalist would not allow it %26amp; still wont.Why hasn't Bush drilled in Alaska for oil?
    Why don't you drill oil in Alaska yourself?
    because he is too busy coming up with ways to help corporate america by bailing out banks and trying to figure out ways to SCREW the average person!!!
    I like brendas answer. Yea, we buy GWB's oil in Texas.


    Ok Brenda time to wake up!
    The environmentalist won't allow him to plus, the libs excise %26amp; windfall profit taxes have made it unprofitable to do so. Oil companies can make just as much or, more profit importing.





    http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/1鈥?/a>
    Because of the power of the environmentalist.
    None of the politicians in DC have the backbone to stand up against the wacko enviromentals. It doesn't matter if they have an R or a D behind their name. We wont drill off the coast of Florida in the Gulf of Mexico because of the same reasons even though Cuba and China are planning on doing just that.


    Makes you sick doesn't it. We have no real leaders in Washington DC
    we have been drilling for oil in alaska for years. anyone remmember exxon valdeez? you know the boat that crashed
    the democrats held enough seats in the senate to create gridlock on such issues.
    because he wants people to buy


    his own oil in texas at a high price
    the tree huggers wont let them
    Because his oil buddies in Texas are getting $110 per barrel, and he doesn't want to ruin a good thing for his buddies.

    Did you believe the Democrat congressman whom today claimed oil companies were refusing to drill on the land?

    they had leased, in order to keep the price of gasoline high?


    Is there any end to the stupidity that comes out of these politicians mouths?Did you believe the Democrat congressman whom today claimed oil companies were refusing to drill on the land?
    He must figure the only time an oil company would want to produce more oil is when prices are low


    there's democrat logic for you


    god are these people ever stupid


    no wonder things are so screwed up


    you have to have the dumbest people in the country running thingsDid you believe the Democrat congressman whom today claimed oil companies were refusing to drill on the land?
    This is true. The oil companies are leasing thousands of acres of land as well as thousands of acres on the continental shelf. They choose not to drill at this time. Why they aren't drilling is unknown to the Congressman, however. Most likely, the costs of finding,drilling, and extracting any oil that MIGHT be there are prohibitive. We also don't know the terms of the leases. Perhaps the lease terms are unfavorable, and the oil companies are awaiting some type of leverage to renegotiate the leases, or for the leases to expire.
    If the Democratic Congress knew what they were doing, they would simply hire inspectors to audit records of the oil companies to show what the research on the oil properties has proven, and then audit the refineries to make sure they're running at capacity, and not being restricted as part of a price-fixing scheme. Funny how they keep us in the dark, though, with this ';he said, she said'; bull$#!t.
    Obviously they don't know beans about the oil business. A lease is not a guarantee oil will be found. Even if it is, the conservationists file lawsuits, and the oil company has to file environmentals with the government (which can be denied) and then they have to get another lease in order to pump the oil.
    Yes.





    I have a brother in law in the oil business and he tells me they quit pumping in the Gulf of Mexico and go get the foreign oil to make higher profit.





    It isn't that there isn't oil it's that they want higher profit and if where they have to drill will cost more than going to Africa to get the oil then that is what they do.





    Let us remember OIL is a NONRENEWABLE resource and will at some point become extinct. So, let find alternatives and stop using so much. Plan your driving, walk, take public transportation, bicycle, use electric (of course unless it is solar charged it isn't free).





    You really think the oil companies have your best interest in mind? Think again.
    No. It is a diversion.





    Democrat Voters will believe Anything----- as long as you throw in a Welfare Check.





    (Those leases are costing Oil Companies Millions %26amp; Millions of Dollars each year. They can't drill them all at once. Idiots don't know a thing about it.)
    That happens to be true...





    We have open reserves that the Republicans... errr... I mean, oil companies... don't want to drill in, because it's their plan to make sure they attain all of the potential oil for the ';futures market';.
    Not really, since the same congressman probably fought drilling the same land tooth and nail until off-shore drilling was put on the table.
    I wonder sometimes if there is any end to the stupidity that I read here on a daily basis coming from the uninformed that love to twist bits of information into statements that are not true or are out of context.
    I wouldn't anymore surprised that he was telling the truth about it than if he was lying about it. They're all lying about it.
    Sounds like something a conspiracy theroist came up with.
    This is coming from the same people who who have the power to approve drilling off shore but will not.
    unfortunately it is true.
    Repubes are repugnant.
    We have proof that there is life on Mars. I can't believe our Congress is home grown.
    I believe it.
    shows the democrats for the liars they are.
    no end in sight,they continue to lie for over 30 years !
    ANSWER: Never happened.





    source?
    no


    no


    and definitely NO
    No, and No and oh yah, NO.
    http://dwb.adn.com/money/industries/oil/鈥?/a>





    Here's one instance.





    Instead of taking what one or the other says as accurate, I like to read it myself.
    No, every excuse that dems keep coming up with to prevent it are complete frauds. It is ok though, because their refusal is killing them.
    If a Democrat says it don't believe it.
  • makeup help
  • If my girlfriend goes off sex am I right to ';drill for oil'; elsewhere.?

    I would rather you plant your seed in the belly of a whore than to spill them on the ground. (Gen 38:7 Gen 38:8 Gen 38:9)If my girlfriend goes off sex am I right to ';drill for oil'; elsewhere.?
    Please don't think me prudish, but that does rather sound like Weapons grade betrayal to me. By the way, the same publication also forbids adultery. Preserve your girlfriends faith in you, not to mention the continued health of your love furniture. Even the Whore has a dignity worth preserving. don't line the pockets of her pimp.








    Why not just work out why your girlfriend has taken to abstention?If my girlfriend goes off sex am I right to ';drill for oil'; elsewhere.?
    I don't see how drilling for oil will satisfy your sexual needs, though it could make you rich if you were to strike say a large oil field. Why did you gf go off sex? Maybe you should talk to her about what you are doing wrong, or not doing.
    Your not a very nice Boy friend if you think like that , and you wrote quotes Why to make yourself feel better about cheating?


    Why don鈥檛 you talk to your girlfriend and found out what is troubling her instead of thinking with your Dick
    wow. you must be really bad in bed if you made her go off sex. Judging by how you think I wouldnt want to have sex with you either. Your a disease waiting to happen.


    You really disgust me
    maybe shes just gone off you?





    how about you split with her, so you go plant seeds in the bellys of whores (gaining STDs while youre at it) and she can find someone who actually turns her on!





    winners all round.
    Pitty help her if she can't do 'it' for a while for some medical reason. You have no loyalty to your woman. Just hope your 'bits' keep performing - or maybe she will go and 'spread her oil' elsewhere?
    Let me see if I've got this right. I've got a dude using bible quotes to justify messing around on his woman?





    Ok.





    Not without abandoning the current drill site to allow someone else to try their own luck first.
    No. You should try to find out why your girlfriend has gone off sex and help her to want it again.


    I'm sure you wouldn't be happy if your girlfriend was asking the same question.
    I wouldn't bother - if your girlfriend has gone off your lame bedroom technique, another girl probably will too.





    Here's a tip for you - it's not a race!!!
    If thats how you feel maybe you should split up and find a more willing partner, save a lot of heartbreak in the long run.
    If u loved and respected your girlfriend,u wouldnt even consider it,no matter wot genesis says.if i were u,i'd try n find out why she's went off sex
    Thanks for the heads up, I never knew that there was Biblical approval for playing away from home.





    Star for you mate.








    .
    ';As ye sow, so shall ye reap';!
    No don't!
    try wan king a bit more !
    no keep it in
    lol so many people will never get what ''true love'' is.








    take it easy babes..........

    China is spending $10 BIL to drill for oil with Brazil off of Brazil's coast. Will Obama bankrupt the US?

    Will we end up buying products that China makes from the oil that comes from the wells in Brazil's ocean while we refuse to drill off of America's coasts?China is spending $10 BIL to drill for oil with Brazil off of Brazil's coast. Will Obama bankrupt the US?
    BIG YAWN. The US doesn't have the capacity to meet its current oil demands by drilling. We have only a small fraction of the world's oil reserves yet we use over a quarter of the world's production.





    BTW, if drilling was the answer why didn't Bush drill all over the place when he and the GOP were in complete control? Its probably because the oil companies have no interest in making the huge investments that would be necessary.








    Next.

    Why won't Congress let us drill for oil and build more nuclear plants? I'm fed up with paying $4.00 for gas.

    10 years ago Congress passed a bill to drill in ANWR. It would of provided about 1.5-2 million barrels of oil a day. We use about 20 million a day. So, nearly 10% of our oil could be coming from that site alone. That would of reduced gasoline prices. But Clinton gave in to the environmentalists and vetoed the bill.


    Nearly all legislation for more nuclear plants and oil refineries has been blocked by the democrats and some wayward republicans. Instead of real action, they drag the oil execs in front of them for a good tongue lashing that accomplishes nothing fruitful. It's all a dog and pony show. They don't care about the price of oil because they are all multimillionaires and it doesn't affect them.Why won't Congress let us drill for oil and build more nuclear plants? I'm fed up with paying $4.00 for gas.
    Liberals.





    Liberals have blocked resolutions in Congress that would reduce our dependence on foreign oil.





    It has nothing to do with the environment, liberals could care less about the environment. The environment is simply a prop they use to promote their socialist agenda.





    The reason is simple: By liberals keeping our demand on foreign oil high, it helps keeps gas prices high. High prices mean an agitated America and more likely Americans will embrace a socialist system to solve problems liberals purposely perpetuate.





    Make no mistake, the liberal agenda is to build a socialist welfare state and they will do anything to make sure that happens.Why won't Congress let us drill for oil and build more nuclear plants? I'm fed up with paying $4.00 for gas.
    The U.S. is the 3rd largest producer of oil in the world. We pump millions of gallons of oil from the U.S. including millions of gallons from the North Slope field in Alaska (the ANWR park land is only a tiny fraction of Alaska). The problem is not how much we produce, it is how much more than that we consume. And most of our electricity generating plants are coal fired so nuclear plants would mostly replace coal fired plants and would have no effect on oil consumption or prices. And the current oil price problem is a problem with speculation in the commodities market and not with supply at all.
    the wells are drilled but we cannot get the oil from the ground due to the enviromentalists. we cannot build the pipelines dut to the enviromentalists. they think that pipelines hurt animals. that is the biggest farce there is. ever seen pictures of the pipline in alaska. the animals rest on it hangout near it and follow it where ever it goes. the populations of the migratory herds has boomed since the pipelines construction. you cannot tell them these things because they only believe what oher enviromentalists tell them. it wouldn't matter if they came to alaska and saw it for themselves they would still believe their own groups other than their own eyes...


    when gas makes 10.00 a gallon the enviromentalists might think about it. but will side with themselves and keep the inflation growing from the fuel costs. the refinery here in north pole alaska is predicting 6.50 a gallon before winter hits in september. so 10 dollar gas is not that far off.
    There's not enough oil left in America to make a significant difference. It's a dying (and deadly) resource. We need to move to sustainable alternatives quickly. As for nuclear plants, Three Mile Island and Chernobyl come to mind, and all the radioactive waste that nobody wants in their backyard.
    $4.00 a gallon is really cheap compared to almost every country in the world.


    Here is Australia, we are $1.63 a litre ($6.23 a gallon)


    Quit being greedy.
    Environmentalists wont stop complaining they preach about saving the environment yet they eat all the plants that clean up the air
    The enviro-nuts are paying key politicians to keep us from doing just that.
    Because of the power of the green people.
    Environmentalists

    Can we drill for oil yet?

    or are we better off to have our economy to collaspe?Can we drill for oil yet?
    No. We haven't suffered enough.


    It's still more important to have horny caribou in some God forsaken corner of Alaska, than affordable gasoline in the rest of the country.


    The government won't stop price increases, or do anything to increase supply, because they want a windfall profits tax.


    This tax won't lower the price we pay, it just let's the government get a piece of the action. They both stand to profit from any price rise.


    So, why then would you expect either Big Oil or Government do anything to stop that?Can we drill for oil yet?
    The problem isn't that we're running out of oil, we're just running out of the easy oil. The Canadian oil sands contain a 300 year supply of crude at current rates of consumption. We also have these oil bearing sands in the US but the Canadians already have production facilities in place and are currently producing 1.2m barrels a day from sand right now.





    If government really wants to do something useful, they should promote immediate increases in this production to 20 million barrels a day (or more).





    Private businesses are increasing production but nothing on the scale a loan from the government could accomplish. 8 billion dollars was raised for a new production facility in North Dakota but won't be on line for several years.





    I am a strong believer in less government but this current situation is a danger to national security and a partnership between the government and private enterprise could actually solve our energy problem if there was just the will to do it.
    it is time to sh*tcan the entire leftist Congress.





    I am sick and tired of these scumbags bowing before the altar of the econuts.





    California, Florida, Alaska, have known reserves of oil.





    Montana, Utah, Colorado North Dakota have a very large known reserve of oil and oil sands, and oil shale. That is 8 times the original amount of oil found in Saudi Arabia. (break even cost of $50-70/bbl





    Wyoming, Montana, (and elsewhere) we have large reserves of coal that can be used in CTL processes to place in the oil feedstock chain. (at a break even cost of $40/bbl).





    Since the 1970s Congress has done not one friggin' thing to change this issue except demand emission and cafe standards, subsidize a net zero gain energy (Ethanol)..





    Our driving population has increased while per person energy consumption and production remained fairly flat.





    As much as the nutjobs demand ';green alternatives'; they remain less then cost effective solutions.





    We have about 530-550 little Neros fiddling in DC while the country burns down economically as the result of eco-pandering.
    Well, it all really depends on the interests of our policymakers. Why don't we use Yellowstone for geothermal, yes plenty of non-polluting, reliable, renewable energy? Why don't we use the coal from out in the West, such as Utah or Nevada? Where sulfur content is much lower?(LESS acid rain)





    Eventually, we will be pushed to get the oil from our own land, not to mention from our neighbors, Mexico and Canada, the question is how much pressure from rising costs for fossil fuels we will have to go through before people finally buckle down and do it.
    we may have too. The thing is though, u have to remember it takes time for this type of thing and it would be years before we are able to see any kind of benefit from this. I agree, its a must but we have our backs up against it. Oil is not as plentiful as before and it will become less so as years go on. Drilling is a must but senseable drilling and eco friendly. It can be done.


    Another oil processing plant would be good also.


    I am one of the few who see the benefit of high oil prices.


    I lived through the 1970s oil crisis and we knew then to start going to smaller cars and alternative fuels. The ball started to roll but not quick enough. Now, we are suffering the consiquences of our thrist for oil. This will spur the country and the world to start looking for other forms of energy. This is a good thing and will make people more environment conscious. This country is at an important point right now to a better future in my belief.
    You really think it would matter? Consumption is down, refineries are operating at 85% and the prices are still rising. It is not supply and demand, only supply. We can't control that.


    Edit: To Raina. Not all oil companies purchase overseas oil, but they charge the same as companies that do. YOU do the math.
    No the Democrat say it would not help that much so they disapprove the Bill again.,go figure it better to buy from someone else.





    grump56 is it better to have your own or have to buy it from someone else ,do the math Sir
    As long as the Dems are controlling Congress and the House,no drilling will be allowed. Then they can still use the oil situation for their own gain,just like they have been.Plays right into OPECs hands. And WE will be the ones to suffer,not the politicians.
    Lets see we had the last 8 years with a republican Texas Oilman President and I guess he forgot huh? And before that we had 8 years with a Clinton who must have forgotten too... Yes it's just those damn Liberals again holding ALL the offices and controlling our economic growth!
    yes but the fricking tree hugging leftist environmentalists won't let it, we have not built a new refinery in thirty years because of these quacks which own so many judges and politicians!!


    we should turn Alaska upside down and drain it dry!!!
    Yes we need more Nuclear Power plants also plus Oil Refineries
    Time for the voters to rise up and demand responsible





    drilling everywhere possible before gas is $10per gallon!





    How would that be good for anyone!!!





    ...CHG...
    No. Save the trees, No drilling in Alaska, No nuclear plant, no more refineries. Al Gore for president.
    We can drill, just not much at all. I guess that's what we get for forgoing the problem since the 1970s.
    We drill in Texas and the Gulf of Mexico all the time.
    we can't drill for oil yet cause polar bears just went back on the endangered species list
    we can drill but the dems won't allow it!
    No. We all must be punished for ';ruining the planet';.
    We're saving it until Mid East runs dry.





    I hope our wallets don't run dry first.

    Oil in Alberta we have drilled we have found and why do we not use it ourselves?

    You haven't drilled, you've dug it up as oil sand. You don't use it yourselves because it costs more to process it than it does to import oil from overseas. That may/will change in the future, but please don't think that it's as simple as running a hose from a hole in the ground to your car.

    Why do we buy oil from far east when we could drill off shore and bluid refines?

    that would make oil as cheap as coalWhy do we buy oil from far east when we could drill off shore and bluid refines?
    Good question I have been asking that a long time. Why did we let the EPA shut down the drilling off our coast? I say we shut down the EPA. There is more oil around our parts but the greenie weenies have the laws locked up so we can't drill or refine.Why do we buy oil from far east when we could drill off shore and bluid refines?
    We do not have enough domestic oil to support our habit. Also, drilling has a terrible impact on the local environment. The saudi's have basically sold their countries environment out. Should we do the same? I don't think so.


    A better question would have been, why do we continue to rely on oil when alternative energy sources are available cheaper, and with less impact on the environment.
    Tell it to the congressmen from FL and AK.
    There is oil all over the world, but it's most plentiful and easy to pump in the Middle East. There are not many companies here willing to invest the $Millions in capitol equipment needed to pump the volume required to support our appetite for Oil... Even at the current high prices it's still cheaper to import oil from other Countries. There are solutions such as renewable energy sources such as solar %26amp; wind power generation, plant based fules such as Ethanol, etc... but even Ethanol has fixed costs that are very high, (capitol equipment and factory costs), eventually these other fuel options will win out over oil, but it will take time. Until then the best thing we can all do is conserve energy as much as possible to reduce demand.
    Without all the BS...





    Because it is Cheaper. No one in thier right mind (and especially someone in business) pays more for a material than they have to. that includes Crude Oil.





    Contrary to popler OPINION, its not cheaper off shore, nor could be made a cheap as coal. Sorry but the marketplace rules regardless of what we may think.





    wer
    Just wanted to add to the discussion.


    I've heard that the crude oil ';quality'; itself is different.


    Crude oil from the middle east is ';easier'; to refine into a useful form than other crude oil from other places.





    Yes, I also believe we should have made refineries in Alaska and anywhere possible in the US 10 years ago in the name of national security and economical stability.





    Btw, the middle east only supplies less than 1/3 of the worlds crude oil.





    The US self produces 40% and imports 60% from foreign countries.


    Out of the imports, only about 20% comes from the middle east.
    Oil under your feet does not mean you can pipe it out easily. It takes a lot of tech. to do so. Will that be more economical than buying from others? Moreover, the terrain and geographical structure in far east is such that makes it easy to get oil from underground.
    Where are you planning to drill for oil offshore? We don't have any oil here, except for a tiny bit in Alaska. Unfortunately almost all of the oil is in the middle east. And there is not an unlimited supply of it there.
    I'd like to think that we are 'using up THEIR oil first' but that is not the case.





    It comes down to money. And environmentalists.





    No new refineries have been brought online in this country in over 20 years. The costs, environmental red tape, and the NIMBY factor pretty much kill that idea when it's proposed for an area...





    The costs of drilling off shore are tremendous, and the DEEPER water you have to drill in, and the deeper it is under the ocean bed, the MORE expensive it becomes.





    In case you were not aware of it, the ';NIMBY'; factor works like this:





    We all realize the fact we need a new refinery (or factory, or power plant, or landfill, or whatever).





    We STRONGLY SUPPORT that we build one as soon as possible...however Not In My Back Yard...





    get the point? Everybody seems to agree that we need new refineries and oil fields, but nobody wants them near where they live!





    NIMBY trumps need.





    However, oil will never be as cheap as coal - in an era of declining production and skyrocketing demand, it will never be 'cheap' again.
  • makeup help
  • Why would anyone want to drill for more oil?

    It wont drop the prices at all. If we do pull out a few million barrels it will take at least 6 years to get any oil production, and a few million barrels will only last a few days....maybe even hours. America has a 20 billion barrel a day addiction right now, its just getting worse. Are you willing to pay 10 cents less now so your kids can suffer when we actually run out?? Lets use all this money for oil drilling and use it to build wind and solar farms that will eventually pay for themselves? Pros and Cons? What do you think?Why would anyone want to drill for more oil?
    We should have drilled years ago, but you liberals have made it impossible, so we need to drill now before the gas is 10 bucks a gallon.


    Conserve now,


    Drill now.

    Will OBH allow the U.S. to drill for gas and oil And build nuke energy plants?

    Or will it be the same o same oWill OBH allow the U.S. to drill for gas and oil And build nuke energy plants?
    He is opposed to both those ideas and wants to raise the taxes on gasoline slowly so he can drive the country to $200,000 Hydro Cell autos and $60,000 electric autos with a 50 mile range.





    May be something he wants but it is nothing we will support.Will OBH allow the U.S. to drill for gas and oil And build nuke energy plants?
    Probably
    He will waste billions of dollars and invoke eminent domain (take peoples property) to build infrastructure which by the way will be his job creation (which this ';job creation'; will only be temporary, but the media will not report that), this infrastructure will be in the form of renewable energy (wind solar, etc...) and the cost for us will out weigh the benefit, and won't produce like nukes. Now this will be done for the super rich investors like the oil CEOs they will have contracts to install and maintain and here is the main reason CHARGE you for this power which you helped pay for. Kinda neat huh. This is why the oil CEOs don't want to drill, kind of like the oil guy on that commercial said, ';we don't have to drill';.





    By the, way Nuclar plants are very safe!
    You sure know the answer sweetie. Same o same o.


    The truth is, its not economically viable to drill for gas at this point in time, he will make a case for nuclear energy.
    What's OBH? Do you mean BHO, our new president? Yes, he's going to allow drilling for gas and oil, and he says he's even promoting nuclear energy. If anyone tries to put a nuclear plant in Oklahoma, they'll have to kill me first.
    Same o same o............
    Nope.





    He will simply throw more money at alternative energy schemes that have yet to produce a practical large-scale energy source.





    Remember the gas prices we had 6 months ago? 10 years prior to that Clinton refused to allow drilling because 'it would take 10 years to see results and alternative energy will have filled the gap by then.'

    Where does McCain want to drill oil?????????

    ugh


    in Denver Appalachian Basin and alaska over wildlife which will kill them and the enviroment.Where does McCain want to drill oil?????????
    Hopefully where the oil is! This is a major problem with the Democratic energy bill. They wrote the bill to exclude the very areas where the Known oil reserves are located. Another political power play. Their intent was to be able to say that we support off shore oil drilling and we passed the bill to prove it. Of course, the little detail ( among others) is they don't support drilling where we know the oil is. What a sham.Where does McCain want to drill oil?????????
    I live in Florida, he can drill HERE. Keep the jobs HERE. Put some tax dollars into Florida's school system. Keep oil dollars out of middle eastern hands. Then maybe some day as we get the technology in place we can use the platforms to install wind or solar farms. Lord knows we have lots of both. Lets all try to work together and not point fingers.
    maybe on the White House lawn.
    where it can be found
    his grandma's *** hole!!

    If the 'No Drill' Demorats had allowed America to drill our own oil in the Wasteland of ANWR 10 years ago,

    Would we be transferring our wealth to the Mid East like we are today?If the 'No Drill' Demorats had allowed America to drill our own oil in the Wasteland of ANWR 10 years ago,
    No, we wouldn't %26amp; that's part of what makes it so frustrating. If Congress would let us drill for our own oil, build some more nuke plants and the rest of us would downsize our vehicles, we could probably tell the ME to go f**k itself.If the 'No Drill' Demorats had allowed America to drill our own oil in the Wasteland of ANWR 10 years ago,
    Yes idiot. You watch too much Fox News. Becuase ANWR dosen't matter. Let me educate you. The world uses 87,000,000 barrels of oil a DAY. 10 years of pumping oil out of ANWR will produces 1 week of world oil use. So Republians answer is to destroy the Habitat in Alaska for one week of oil, SMART. Oil men in this country and in the Mid East love these high oil prices. High oil prices have made it economical to explore remote, hard to reach and expensive to pump oil. Bush is an oil man. Do you think oil men hate these high oil prices? New SUVs are at 1/3 to 1/2 price now. Do you think SUV salemen love their low prices?
    If these anti-drill people were smart, they would let the drilling occur. They could really let the Reps dig themselves a hole. If drilling is not the answer as they say, America would see it for what it is. A rouse by Reps and ';big Oil'; to scam America. That would solidify their case against the Reps.





    This won't happen because they know it can work and they don't want America to see them for what they are.
    If we had drilled in ANWAR ten years ago, The holes would be dry, the oil would be in China and we would be the proud owners of a dirty wasteland and the oil companies would claim that it was too expensive for them to clean it up.





    Say ';hi'; to Rush for me and tell him I said that he is a cheese-pile.
    yes, because we would still be at war (probably), and drilling in ANWR wouldn't satisfy more then a fraction of our energy needs.





    Plus, everyone seems to forget this, we don't get that much oil from OPEC, most of our oil is from non-Opec nations.
    lol...You know, the off shore drilling ban was put in to place by George HW Bush (41). I love that this gets omitted all the time.





    ...and if the government had had some foresight 30 years ago during the gas crisis, we might have had an alternative energy source by now.
    the wasteland is inside of your head, ANWR is amazing, obviously you have never been there and are just repeating a talking point, as any greater depth would too much for you to understand.
    Right now, there is more than five TRILLION dollars worth of oil sitting in the ground, and they still don't want to drill. How stupid is that? Just so we don't disturb a couple of caribu
    Yes, we would, because we still wouldn't be able to outdrill our own use on a daily basis.





    By the way, your candidate could be considered one of those ';No Drill Demorats'; you mentioned.
    If the Republicans weren't in bed with big oil companies, perhaps we would have an alternative source of energy today and we wouldn't need to have questions like this.
    YES





    Plus look at all the lost investments, if ANWR oil had been sold for 10 bucks a barrel in the 90's





    Thank God Bush had enough insight to drive up the price of OIl





    $200 a Barrel by Christmas
    The prices would be lower and we most likely would be in a far better economic position today.
    No Way.
    no



    Not nearly as much plus we would have many more jobs.





    fs

    So the United States of America drill for oil in America? Why or why not? ?

    Because if tomorrow the Saudi Government decides, ';Hey, let's ruin the USA and not sell them oil'; we are done for. The dem congress is reducing our reserve supply. It's stupid to pay top dollar for a product you already own.So the United States of America drill for oil in America? Why or why not? ?
    Absolutely. How can we expect other countries to drill when we won't drill on our land? Also, the drilling area is so miniscule in the big picture, it really is worth it to drill. We need to not be so dependant on foreign oil.So the United States of America drill for oil in America? Why or why not? ?
    Why? To make us independent of forign oil! Lower gas prices!





    And to Oh No! who said they hated the leader of this country at times, you do realize that Bush is all for off shore drilling and its Pelosi that's blocking the vote from going to the Senate floor right?
    I just asked a question about this.





    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?鈥?/a>
    Why? Because it makes us more energy independent and brings us revenue and jobs.





    Why not? It might kill some caribu or salmon.






    I think we need to drill off the coast cause china is doing it... Why should they get to take our oil, I hate the leader of this country at times.
    Yes, but not now.





    We should first use oil in other countries as long as we can afford it. Only then should we tap our own reserves.





    US Needs Foreign Oil
    because this is where the oil is? well, just drill wherever there is oil

    What states/areas in the U.S. are best to drill for oil? Are there any areas in New York State?

    As others mentioned, no major oil finds in New York. Natural Gas is another story. In the past, there were minor finds. Now with new technology, the Marcellus Shale formation can be a major find. For a map of the formation, including its extent in NYS, go to: http://geology.com/articles/marcellus-sh鈥?/a>





    For oil in the US, the Bakken Shale area in northeastern Montana and northwestern North Dakota is being worked on by Brigham Exploration, EOG Resources, MDU Resources, Northern Oil %26amp; Gas company, Whiting Petroleum and others


    The Devonian Black Shale formation is in Eastern Tenn.


    The Permian Basin is a major oil area in eastern New Mexico and western Texas (Occidental Petroleum is there). There are also oil wells all over south Texas and northeastern Texas. Years ago when I visited Kilgore, most of the town smelled like a roof being tarred.


    The Pinedale Anticline area is in Woming and is being developed by Ultra Petroleum.


    There is (or was when I was there years ago) a working oil well on the grounds of the Oklahoma state capitol building.


    I also saw oil wells in California.


    Southeastern Kansas also has some wells.


    Every once in awhile, I received slow mail spam hyping some penny stock that wants to drill in Kentucky.What states/areas in the U.S. are best to drill for oil? Are there any areas in New York State?
    NYS? How do you think Wellsville got its name?





    The best areas are in the West, though. If the price of crude keeps going up, watch for the oil shales and sands being tapped. It's neither clean nor efficient but we have more petroleum locked up there than they have in the Middle East.What states/areas in the U.S. are best to drill for oil? Are there any areas in New York State?
    oil is where you find it, but there are not any oil wells that are significant producers in NY state-some nat. gas, hope this helps...good luck
    There were a lot of natural gas wells caped in central NY when I lived there . As for oil ?
  • makeup help
  • I say we drill for oil here in america, rather than be dependent on the Middle East. Are you with me?

    Yah we need to stop FUNDING TERROR, use our own dang oil! We have more than the MIDDLE EAST COMBINED! .I say we drill for oil here in america, rather than be dependent on the Middle East. Are you with me?
    No, because I think that would substitute short-term gain for long-term cost. America has relatively little oil and we will not gain access to that for some time (it takes time to discover oil, drill, collect and process). It will be a drop in the bucket compared to our national usage, so we will still need to rely on the Middle East for the lion's share. In exchange, we will permanently alter the environment, harm endangered species living in the affected regions and spend large sums that could be better spent elsewhere.





    I would propose we devote our energies toward increased fuel efficiency and standardizing an alternative fuel source. Our country is innovative given the right incentive and I think we could accomplish this pretty quickly. We just need someone to get the ball rolling.I say we drill for oil here in america, rather than be dependent on the Middle East. Are you with me?
    I'll agree with Tatiana. We can drill here, but really, it's not going to decrease our dependence on foreign oil. It will certainly bring some big profits to big oil. May decrease our oil imports by a modest percentage, but as long as we import most of our oil, a modest percentage still puts us at the mercy of the middle east. We need to reduce consumption and develop alternative power sources. Let 'em drill, but keep the focus on research and development of alternative sources.
    Multiple sources within the United States could yield massive amounts of oil, which could lead to a significant drop in prices. I believe that the neccesary course of action is this: We must pursue new sources of energy that are clean and cheap. This is possible and viable, but will also take considerable effort and time.





    Therefore, in the meantime, we must use all domestic oil options that we have (i.e. offshore, ANWR in Alaska and other options). Once new, clean and cheap fuels are found and perfected, we should wean the country off oil alltogether.





    But in the short term, yes you are correct: we can no longer depend on foreign oil; it will cripple the economy
    Well, in the long term it's a fine idea. More important, though, is developing other technology that takes us away from oil all together. We need to do this asap.





    Off-Shore drilling is not going to help us NOW. It will help us in a few years, and we don't know how much it will really make a difference. We can explore, but we have to keep in mind that the idea is being packaged as an instant fix to the oil crisis - not true!! It's not a really viable option for our current gas prices.
    Exactly! The environment is for us here to use! And we must be careful how we use it! All we have done for years is pay our money to the Saudi's and they in turn support terrorism against us! I think about that every mile i drive and every gallon I put in my car! Those idiots see us as the infidel! The sooner we have more of our own oil and work on other means of transportation and expand our technology the better off we will be!
    Yep. I used to be an environmentalist, but then went to work in DC and saw first hand that their agenda was anti-capitalist and not environmental at all, although that's what their rank and file thought. A real bunch of arrogant jerks is what I saw of the environmental movement on Capitol Hill.
    Its a bit curious why the elder Bush when president put a ban on it, being an oil man . It does not appear elder Bush was much different from his son, whom is trying to finish what his father left undone, like war, getting his hands on Social Security, it makes no sense, but I can guarntee there must be an advantage to him!
    no. drilling off the US coast would have very little effect on the world market...to the tune of dropping the price 1-3 dollars a barrel. thats about a nickel a gallon..and we wouldn't even see a drop of that oil until at least 10 years from now.





    we don't need more oil...we need 100 mpg cars. somebody get on that
    It would be a symbolic gesture at best. We don't have enough oil to alter the global, or U.S., energy market, and it would take years to get our relatively measily reserves into production.





    The US has about 2% of the known world oil reserves and we consume over 20% of current world supply.





    http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0872964.h鈥?/a>
    I say take care of ourselves first. I am tired of the US support other countries before ourselves. I also tired of the stupid environmentalists stop the drilling. Nature is more resilient than we are. If they truly believed in evolution then they would know that all living things could adapt!!!
    yea, i agree that we should free ourselves from the OPEC countries power and make ourselves independent. but in the long run, i do believe that we will have more choices for fuels than just gasoline. a variety is what this country needs. but for the current generation, offshore drilling is a must. after we get back on our feet, then the hunt for more fuels must begin.
    When will you people get off this!





    Every oil rig in America (including ones under construction) is booked through 2013.





    Most of our oil doesn't come from the middle east. It comes from Canada, Mexico and Venezula.
    No way-





    it makes no sense for us to get oil out of our own backyard when we can buy it for ridiculous prices from totalitarian religious states with no freedoms.





    Who cares if it takes 10 years- because it takes a while does not make it wrong.





    Liberals are so idiotic!
    yes I am. Drill, conserve, nuclear power, wind, solar and anything else they can think of. I'm for gerbil power if it takes one dime away from the oil cartels.
    let the oil company drill the land the already have .then we moved on. and please then bush and MCsame that we need to release some of the oil reserve .this is an emergency.
    Yes and its not 10 years, its 2 to 6 years we can still work on alternative sources but for now drill away. And it was Clinton who stopped it from happening before we could have already been using it. Thanks Clinton you a$$hole!
    Yes! Just like Mr Pickens says; $700 Billion leaves our country every year for foreign lands. Just that is enough reason to drill OUR own oil.
    OH...YEA, LET'S START IN THE MIDWEST. LET'S GET TO THE MIDDLE OF THE HEARTLAND.
    Yes,Last time I checked my car doesn't run on wind,sun or Nuclear.So we need something to fill in until they find a way to replace our current auto fuel.
    We just need to get off of oil. Once we put that pressure on then we will see less pressure on us.
    But of course, we have 3 properties they can start anytime.
    Yes, but the environmentalists have too much control over ';Mother Earth';.
    Yes.... Drill here... Drill NOW
    YES!!!!!!!
    Yes I am !!!
    Word..
    Yes !! I !!! Am !!!!
    I don't count, why do you ask me?
    No, not really. We need to get out of the oil trap and invest in nuclear, solar, wind, geothermal, etc energy resources. Oil is not renewable and it is a major source of pollution. It is the energy resource of the PAST. Drilling won't even bring in any oil for years to come, no effect at the pump....