Should bush drill for oil in the USA that threatens our environment?

do you enjoy spending your summer on a polluted beach? heres a good picture of your future----%26gt; http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/photosvideos/slideshows/lebanon-oil-spill?page=3


bush owns oil and he dont care about you.


all he cares about is his investmentsShould bush drill for oil in the USA that threatens our environment?
Wrong, try again.Should bush drill for oil in the USA that threatens our environment?
Here's a small list of what's wrong with your question...





Bush isn't going to drill for oil


The offshore ban means nothing until Congress does the same thing.


The drilling would be offshore, not on beaches


Drilling for oil doesn't harm the surrounding environment


Drilling for oil doesn't pollute beaches


The picture is from a refinery, not from a well


The picture is the result of terrorist activity


Bush has a lot more to be concerned about then any investments he may have
No, he should let the oil companies drill for the oil. He shouldn't have to do it himself.
I can't think of a more biased site to go to. We have ways of drilling that cut the pollution levels I have seen films of fish thriving near offshore rigs and Caribu living under oil pipelines. So using greenpeace as a credible source is like using the KKK as an expert on civil rights.
Now here is a very important question. Please read it VERY carefully. Did the oil from that picture come from a drilling rig?


.


.


.


I'm betting, ';no.';
I hope your not one of those friendly folks crying about high oil prices.
Whats the difference between OUR beaches and the beaches of other nations?





If you want off oil fine then lets get off our duffs and get off oil but until then we are one of the biggest consumers of oil and huge hypocrites for saying not in my back yard but its ok in your back yard.





By the way we have new technology, this is not 1980.





Florida Resident
We should have been researching other forms of fuel years ago. We knew this day would come. But there was is too much money in it for big oil and motor companies.
yeah, and greenpeace is not a biased organization at all. Try sticking with the facts. Oil drilling does not harm the environment.
Considering his record as an oil man before entering the political field, he should not be trusted around any oil drilling operations. He started an oil speculation business on a Federally Insured small business loan. The result was afew dry holes, no oil and taxpayers paid off the loan. Even more interesting is that he built a two million dollar ranch at the same time.
No.





His oil buddies at Exxon can do without making another $10 billion in record profits at our expense.





Exactly what the Reblubigans want. Damned if you do (drill for oil, Bush + Co. make billions at our expense while risking polluting our shorelines), damned if you don't ( they'll black ball you and make it look like you WANT high fuel prices).
Sourcing Greenpeace loses what credibility you might have had.





Vive le DGSE! (Hooray for the DGSE, the French special intelligence agency which sank the Rainbow Warrior)
Screw the environment. What has a panda bear done for me lately? I got to go to work!
Oil is good.
Did you READ the caption with it, that spill was caused by a bombing of a refinery. We need oil and gas and if they have to stick the pipe in greenpeace's bum I don't care.
Yes, we should. Environmentalists lost their credibility long ago.





Jessica: lol
You are so filled with the liberal propaganda you probably believe in Global warming too you poor soul. First Hurricanes Katrina and Rita destroyed over one hundred oil platforms and where were the news stories of the major oil spills, oh yeah there were none. The fact is that what you show was old technology and the gulf of Mexico proves that our new technology has progressed while your mindset hasn't kept up.
No, considering that all the oil executives are saying that prices are so high, not because of a lack of supply, but because of the drastic increase in oil speculators, who are unregulated.